"CTOR has No math proof of necessity. No benchmarks of the theory, let alone the implementation. No engineering rigor around what we actually would gain. (All claims have been debunked)." True or not?

Full quote:

“CTOR has No math proof of necessity. No benchmarks of the theory, let alone the implementation. No engineering rigor around what we actually would gain. (All claims have been debunked).

Graphene with extra order data without CTOR, as things are today is basically just as efficient.

​Big O analysis, benchmarks and proper engineering practices or gtfo.

The price to pay for decentralization is that various individuals and teams, who lack professional systems engineering best practices, will attempt to control the narrative and dangle “shiny new features” in front of you.

​Give me original uncapped Bitcoin, or give me nothing.

  • NO forcing CTOR or any other ordering with extensive math, theory, and benchmarks.
  • NO forcing pre-consensus
  • NO forcing different transaction format

The smugness of anyone saying “it was on an agreed upon roadmap published a few months ago” is shocking. No one agreed upon anything. Your 1 user 1 vote has no place here when Bitcoin is 1 cpu 1 vote.”

https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/9g0lmp/this_change_removes_any_opportunities_for_better/e61kno8/?context=3

submitted by /u/Zarathustra_V
[link] [comments]
Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/.rss?format=xml

Leave a Reply

Welcome to CCC

X
Welcome to CCC
How can we help you?
WooChatIcon 0
%d bloggers like this: